Tony Giammalva vs Broderick Dyke Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Giammalva vs B. Dyke

Tony Giammalva

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Left-Handed

Broderick Dyke

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-To-Head: Giammalva 1 - 0 Dyke

They have played 2 sets in total, with Tony Giammalva winning 2 and Broderick Dyke winning 0. The last match between Tony Giammalva and Broderick Dyke was at the Melbourne, 28-12-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Tony Giammalva getting the victory 6-4 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Giammalva	1
Dyke	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Melbourne(12-28-82)

Stats

Tony Giammalva

Broderick Dyke

T. Giammalva vs B. Dyke H2H Profile

T. Giammalva	Stats	B. Dyke
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.37% (89-95)	Career Total W/L	44.78% (120-148)
1	Grass	0
1	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Giammalva vs B. Dyke Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tony Giammalva has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Broderick Dyke has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tony Giammalva, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Broderick Dyke has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tony Giammalva has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broderick Dyke has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tony Giammalva has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Broderick Dyke winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tony Giammalva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 38/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13). Broderick Dyke has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 53/ 62), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 14/ 25).
Player level: In the last year, Tony Giammalva has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Broderick Dyke has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tony Giammalva winning 1 times and Broderick Dyke being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tony Giammalva winning 2 and Broderick Dyke winning 0. The last match between Tony Giammalva and Broderick Dyke was at the Melbourne, 28-12-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Tony Giammalva getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tony Giammalva has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Broderick Dyke has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tony Giammalva has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broderick Dyke has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tony Giammalva has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broderick Dyke has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tony Giammalva vs Broderick Dyke Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Giammalva vs B. Dyke H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Giammalva	Stats	B. Dyke
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	9
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Giammalva Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - 24-06-1985
R1 John FitzgeraldJ. Fitzgerald	L	6-4 7-5 6-1	Stats
Houston - 25-02-1985
R3 David PateD. Pate	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Taipei - 29-10-1984
R4 Hank PfisterH. Pfister	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R3 Van WinitskyV. Winitsky	W	6-1 3-6 6-3	Stats
Tokyo Outdoor - 08-10-1984
R2 Drew GitlinD. Gitlin	L	7-6 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Dyke Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 18-01-1993
R1 Andrei ChesnokovA. Chesnokov	L	6-3 7-5 5-7 6-2	Stats
Adelaide - 04-01-1993
R1 Alex O'BrienA. O'Brien	L	7-6(4) 7-6(5)	Stats
New Haven - 17-08-1992
R1 Thierry GuardiolaT. Guardiola	L	6-4 3-6 6-3	Stats
Australian Open - 13-01-1992
R1 John McEnroeJ. McEnroe	L	6-2 6-0 6-1	Stats
Wimbledon - 24-06-1991
R1 Arnaud BoetschA. Boetsch	L	6-3 7-6(3) 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Giammalva vs B. Dyke Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Giammalva	Stats	B. Dyke
48.37% (89/95)	YTD Win/Loss	44.78% (120/148)
50.22% (232/230)	Sets Win/Loss	46.07% (311/364)
49.60% (2174/2209)	Games Win/Loss	48.55% (3104/3289)
51.61% (32/30)	Hard Win/Loss	46.09% (53/62)
52.05% (38/35)	Clay Win/Loss	35.90% (14/25)
39.29% (11/17)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.94% (27/26)
38.10% (8/13)	Grass Win/Loss	42.62% (26/35)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
601.9	Average Opponent Rank	365.21
37.50% (9/15)	Slam W/L	25.00% (7/21)
28.57% (2/5)	Masters W/L	33.33% (6/12)
42.57% (43/58)	Main Tour W/L	42.48% (65/88)
67.31% (35/17)	Challenger W/L	60.87% (42/27)
50% (79/159)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	47% (112/236)
43% (10/23)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	23% (7/30)
75% (3/4)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	25% (1/4)
44% (28/64)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (43/96)
79% (94/74)	1st Set Won, Won Match	75% (136/102)
20% (94/19)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (136/33)
17% (89/15)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (131/17)